Better than perfect vision

Posted by on January 11th, 2008 in body mods

Until now I thought LASIK was just one of the things they did to help people on Extreme Makeover. Turns out it’s almost guaranteed to give you better than 20/20 vision.

It’s sure worked for plenty of sportsmen:

Does the upgrade help? Looks that way. Maddux, a pitcher for the Atlanta Braves, was 0-3 in six starts before his surgery. He won nine of his next 10 games. Kite had LASIK in 1998 and won six events on the Champions Tour over the next five years. Three months after his surgery, Irwin captured the Senior PGA Tour Nationwide Championship.

According to Golf Digest, Woods aimed for 20/15 when he signed up for LASIK. This probably didn’t strike Woods as enhancement, since he was already using contacts that put him at 20/15. Now ads and quotes offering 20/15 are everywhere. One LASIK practice takes credit for giving Irwin 20/15 vision. Another boasts of raising Barber to 20/15 and calls the result “better than perfect.” Other sellers promise the same thing and offer evidence to back it up. Last year, they report, 69 percent of traditional LASIK patients in a study had 20/16 vision six months after their surgery, and new “wavefront” technology raised the percentage to 85. Odds are, if you’re getting LASIK, you’re getting enhanced.

At 20/15, Kanell can read the eyes of defensive backs. Tom Lehman, who will lead the U.S. golf team in next year’s Ryder Cup, says Lasik improved his ability to “judge distances”—a common benefit, according to the technology’s purveyors. Woods says he’s “able to see slopes in greens a lot clearer.” Woods’ eye surgeon told the Los Angeles Times, “Golfers get a different three-dimensional view of the green after LASIK.” They “can see the grain” and “small indentations. It’s different. Lasik actually produces, instead of a spherical cornea, an aspherical cornea. It may be better than normal vision.”

LASIK

No prizes for guessing the origin of this technology:

Always at the forefront of technology, the U. S. military felt they could gain a comparative advantage in combat if their soldiers could operate with a superior level of vision over their opponent, and they were happy to finance the initial stages of the research into “super vision”. So ophthalmologists got to work. They discovered that the difference between a 20/20 eye and a 20/15 or 20/10 eye is that the “normal”, 20/20 eye still has very subtle irregularities, not just on the cornea (the front part of the eye, which LASIK reshapes), but also inside. LASIK can be used to correct these distortions by adjusting the laser treatment to compensate for them. Eye researchers then turned to astronomers, who had found a way to see distant stars through the distortions of the Earth’s atmosphere thanks to wavefront technology. Each eye became a planet of its own as ophthalmologists learned to map out an eye’s unique pattern of subtle differences. The result: customized treatment, of which the most popular brand name is CustomVue.

Besides creating better than 20/20 results in more patients, CustomVue also improves night vision. “At night, every irregularity counts because the pupil is dilated,” said Dr. Sandeep Kakaria, Fellow in Refractive Surgery at the Filatov Eye Institute, a research center that specializes in refractive surgery.“ So a technology that is able to correct these tiny bumps and dips will increase visual acuity in low light.

What’s not to like? Well, the price tag I’m guessing. But this has to rank highly on the list of practical body mods out there that are a mature technology.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

12 Responses to “Better than perfect vision”

  1. hm, interesting… but I wonder how much of this is mainly laser clinics’ heavy marketing ith Sports celebs. check this:

    “10 Reasons why you should NOT have Lasik“
    http://www.lasikeyesurgerywebsite.com/Ten%2520Reasons.pdf

  2. @Hector – that doesn’t seem like the most reputable website.
    esp. since i get a 404 error on that URL

  3. I remember reading about this and the article I read suggested that after mapping the corneal irregularities, it was a good idea to give people a pair of glasses or contacts that gave them ‘supervision’ first. Because some people started to get really freaked out about the amount of DETAIL that they were now seeing everywhere. Sometimes you don’t want to be able to count every hair on the back of the head of the person sitting on the far side of the room.

    Reminded me of the ever present threat of ‘cyber-psychosis’ in the Cyberpunk 2020 RPG, “upgrade your legs, roll for cyber-psychosis”.

  4. sorry about the broken link. i read the pdf online and didn’t know the website was off. try these instead:

    http://www.visionsurgeryrehab.org/

    http://www.complicatedeyes.org/

    http://lasik-flap.com/

    the main argument of that pdf file was that the laser techniques have not been fully tested before commercial use [it'd take a decade to follow each patient's complete surgery outcome].

    also that eye clinics are extremely pushy – in a fast-food way – because to them it’s quick money.

    one other thing [that i've seen confirmed by two friends of mine who have undergone Lasik and still have to use corrective glasses or contacts]: once you do it, your eyes are not “virgin” anymore.

    since no doctor can be sure whether your myopia [for example] will be fully corrected, cutting up your eyes a second or third times are progressively dangerous.

  5. I have never heard of LASIK being used this way. I know I couldn’t get it because I’m as blind as a thing that’s blind. I wonder why this isn’t better known?

    Last I wore contacts, my doctor made them the same prescription as my glasses. Soon after, I went into a bookstore, and wandered around in awe, saying “When did paperbacks get so BIG?” I guess the lenses were over correcting. It was actually really unnerving, but mostly because I didn’t initially fathom what was happening and was pretty sure someone had dosed me.

  6. @Evil Paul – I like that. Cyber-psychosis.

    My grandmother-in-law just had cataracts removed from both eyes. She cried when she saw herself clearly for the first time in decades, aghast at how old she’d become.

    @zoem – actually, the last ep of Extreme Makeover I saw they dealt with a similar case. The lady was ineligible for LASIK, so instead they used what they said was a new technique – implantable contact lenses. Which, apparently is better for treating myopia. No word though on whether it increases your night vision though ;)

  7. That is a sad story – though sensory overload upon correction seems to be a common thing among geriatrics. I always find myself going back to that when thinking of sensory augmentation – I think it might take a special kind of brain to draw in new types or greater amounts of data.

    The implantable contacts are fantastic tech. They seem like they’d be more precise than hacking around with a scalpel or laser (which depend in great part on the skill of the one hacking).

    Personally, I’m not sure I would go for implantables, though I know as a teenager I would have – I suppose that my glasses have now become part of my body/self image. I’d want them even if I could see without them. Whoops, so there goes my functionoverfashionista status…

  8. My eyes are shit, so I would love to have 20/10 vision, at least so that half-blur I see is clearer.

  9. It’s actually a kinda cool procedure. I had it done cos my sight was apalling, and you get to see them peeling back the top layer of your eye! Freakin’ sweet, huh? But you don’t smell your own eyes being scorched by the laser, sad to say…

  10. I’ve had perfect vision my whole life and as a child probably better than 20/20. I wonder what this enhancement would do for someone like myself? Could I read fine print from across a room? I think I recall when a friend of mine got Lasik circa 2000 he went from blurry to being able to read highway signs as far as I could. I don’t know what advantage it would give me though, although better night vision sounds like it would make driving at night safer.

  11. [...] than perfect vision Thomas Tooma wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptAccording to Golf Digest, Woods aimed [...]

  12. [...] Dr. Lloyd wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt [...]