Salvia Research Goes Mainstream

Posted by on May 4th, 2008 in bio-hacking, gardening, health, medical, quotes

Researchers at the Brookhaven National Laboratory are conducting studies on the physical absorption of Salvia divinorum in order to determine if it has any conventional medicinal properties and to determine why it is used.

Quickly gaining popularity among teenagers and young adults, salvia is legal in most states, but is grabbing the attention of municipal lawmakers. Numerous states have placed controls on salvia or salvinorin A – the plant’s active component – and others, including New York, are considering restrictions.

“This is probably one of the most potent hallucinogens known,” said Brookhaven chemist Jacob Hooker, the lead author of the study, which is the first to look at how the drug travels through the brain. “It’s really important that we study drugs like salvia and how they affect the brain in order to understand why they are abused and to investigate their medicinal relevance, both of which can inform policy makers.”

Hooker and fellow researchers used positron emission tomography, or PET scanning, to watch the distribution of salvinorin A in the brains of anesthetized primates. In this technique, the scientists administer a radioactively labeled form of salvinorin A (at concentrations far below pharmacologically active doses) and use the PET scanner to track its site-specific concentrations in various brain regions.

Within 40 seconds of administration, the researchers found a peak concentration of salvinorin A in the brain – nearly 10 times faster than the rate at which cocaine enters the brain. About 16 minutes later, the drug was essentially gone. This pattern parallels the effects described by human users, who experience an almost immediate high that starts fading away within 5 to 10 minutes.

High concentrations of the drug were localized to the cerebellum and visual cortex, which are parts of the brain responsible for motor function and vision, respectively. Based on their results and published data from human use, the scientists estimate that just 10 micrograms of salvia in the brain is needed to cause psychoactive effects in humans.

PET scan of a monkey brain with Salvia intake The research is notable for a few reasons.  First of all, like the article says, “The drug targets a receptor that is known to modulate pain and could be important for therapies as far reaching as mood disorders.”   However, there’s also the issue of Salvia’s Scheduling to contend with as more mainstream research, even as it continualy shows Salvia to have no negative side effects, does lead to further and further attempts to make it illegal.  (Research like this is part of the “eight factor test” which the Controlled Substances Act requires before a substance can be called a “controlled substance” and made illegal to posses.)

There’s also the interesting question of the methodologies they’re using to attempt to figure out why people “abuse” Salvia.

Salvia doesn’t cause the typical euphoric state associated with other hallucinogens like LSD, Hooker said. The drug targets a receptor that is known to modulate pain and could be important for therapies as far reaching as mood disorders.

“Most people don’t find this class of drugs very pleasurable,” Hooker said. “So perhaps the main draw or reason for its appeal relates to the rapid onset and short duration of its effects, which are incredibly unique. The kinetics are often as important as the abused drug itself.”

The logic there — that Salvia despite not having a euphoric high and despite being quite useless as a recreational drug is popular because it is fast acting — is interesting, to say the least.

There’s also a usage of language that presages an issue that all Grinders (not just those invested in cognitive and neurological freedoms, like myself)  will eventually have to deal with.    The press-release says that Salvia does not produce euphoria, but they still refer to a “high”.  Salvia is a non-addictive legal substance but users are still referred to as “abusing” it.   This is the linguistic legacy of the War on Drugs and it’s a tricky hurdle that more and more is going to face other kinds of Grinders, as well.  Just as it’s hard to discuss “drugs” without using the language of drug control, for good or ill — it is also policy of organizations like the American Society of Plastic Surgeons that body modification is always mutilation.  As the phenomenon of people testbeding technologies and techniques in their own body comes more into public awareness, the more that the language of mutilation and body dysmorphia will make it hard to have a conversation about the ideas that drive various flavours of Grinding.   (Not that body dysmorphia is not a real thing… it is just happens to also be easily used as a way of controlling the perceived experiences of body modders.)

But I digress.  Salvia is an fascinating substance with a long and expansive history  that I find pretty useful, in regards to the “making your head bigger” flavour of Grinding.  When looking for reasons why it is abused, I tend to think that perhaps researching quotes like this:

“The purpose of these sacraments is to purify, and to open the road. When it opens,
it’s as clear as the blue sky, and the stars at night are as bright as suns.”
—Aurelia Aurora Catarino (Mazatec shaman)

Might be just as helpful as creating a hypothesis that links the substance’s use with how fast it is absorbed and processed, even though it’s not recreationally useful at all.

Although, speaking of useful, if you’re interested in following up on Salvia further yourself here is Daniel Siebert’s Salvia divinorum FAQ and his comprehensive listing of Salvia laws and restrictions, both taken from his excellent and informative Sage Wisdom website.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

12 Responses to “Salvia Research Goes Mainstream”

  1. An unfortunate salvia story that is appearing in parallel with this research:
    http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/84158/

  2. Excellent post! Overall the information in both post and quotes is very accurate to my knowledge, though I do have one slight criticism. The second quote refers to salvia’s onset and duration as very unique when, in fact, it is very similar to smoked DMT (the psychedelic component of ayahuasca) which was first synthesized in 1931. It’s natural sources were discovered by the west in 1946 after a long history of human use in South America. It yields the same type of trip when smoked without the uncomfortable physical side effects of salvia.

    As for nosmo’s article above, the ignorance surrounding drug use in the US is profoundly disturbing. The article at least highlights the bullshit concerning dosage size where the recreational dose of < 1 gram of extract is equated directly to the weight of raw leave posed by the unfortunate man in the article. It still mentions the ridiculous scenario of someone driving on salvia, though. I would be impressed by someone on a recreational dose of salvia being able to walk upright, let alone start a car. If someone is ignorant enough to smoke it while driving, that is the fault of the drug war and the resultant fact that salvia is generally sold as incense thus lacking any kind of warnings about effects of consumption.

  3. I’m very much so against drug prohibition on any means, feeling is you’re not harming someone else, there is no crime. But in line with grinding and transhumanism, shouldn’t the idea be to prefect the human body to the point that perpetual alteration is no longer necessary? I myself have used a great quantitiy of drugs, but it’s gotten…dull to me. I’m not insulting anyone else’s use of drugs, only saying that ceding towards greater and greater amounts of mind alteration through herbal or medical means, seems to hinder the idea of altering oneself for more permenant and psychological and/or physical characteristic, even spiritual. Laws should not hinder individuals, but shouldn’t there still be thought towards and against by the individual? Not even including moral reasons or social norms, which honestly hold little weight to me.

  4. Good piece, Kevin.
    I especially love this point:
    “Just as it’s hard to discuss “drugs” without using the language of drug control, for good or ill — it is also policy of organizations like the American Society of Plastic Surgeons that body modification is always mutilation.”
    Considering the sheer horridness of the end results of the procedures that august body considers not to be mutilation (I offer Jordan, Dolly Parton and many, many others as evidence), that’s a laughable, if predictable, statement.

    (I sometimes wonder if there’s some hidden aesthetic among celebrity cosmetic surgery users that us poor unwashed just don’t grasp… of course it’s all in the visual receptors of the beholder.
    Maybe if Angelina got some grinding done, it’d suddenly become hip. Maybe that would not be such a good thing either.)

    @Senok:
    I get what you’re saying about “the point that perpetual alteration is no longer necessary” – but to me the use of entheogens and other neurochemicals is simply another set of tools… and they’ll be useful for some time until the tech for direct neural working by other means is useable, and I suspect long after.
    Also, I wouldn’t say that a permanent alteration can or should be made to produce a single mindset or group of characteristics – I like a bit of wiggle room in such matters! Since everyone’s biochemistry has a great degree of variation in reaction to drugs (or implants or even environmental stimuli) one size of grind likely won’t fit all.

  5. I agree Cat Vincent, but even as we grind away at our beings technologically or chemically, which I’m not insulting or putting down, we know little of what our minds and bodies can accomplish without these “aids.” I know of few drugs which truly clarify how the world is, salvia is a hallucinagen, kind of hard to argue it allows us to see any form of reality, and please let’s not get into some metaphysical discussion of what is reality. I’m not saying let’s not use it, I just fear that as we alter ourselves, we’re losing sight of many techniques and abilities we ourselves can use without aid. When arguing spirituality and culture, many of the cultures that used drugs, also relied more heavily on meditation, I know many would argue they mediate, but still it seems few and far between to find someone who can really do much to get there shit in order. I know a great many “spiritual drug users” all seem to be ignoring major portions of their lives. I’m not completely putting down drugs and technology, and I am aware of exceptions, only shouldn’t it be seen as a completely new medium, not a replacement to an old. I am only expressing fear that this is lacking, that we are searching for the mind opening cure so many others have looked for, that LSD was claimed to be in the 60s, but that we’ll miss the necessary internal infrastructure to do such, if such a drug or tech exists.

    I just look around and see many ODs, suicides, murders, and etc. We are progressing technologically, we are progressing pharmacology, but it seems we’re losing ourselves in the process.

  6. To clarify, obviously I am a fan of transhumanism, grinding, etc. etc. Otherwise, it wouldn’t exactly make sense for me to be here, reading this. Call me the voice of doom, though I prefer voice of reason, I just feel a need to see the issues from all sides, see the faults that even we have as we are building, so we may fix them, and progress can truly excel.

  7. @Senok – You make some good points, there are lots of techniques for mind expansion that don’t involve pharmacological intervention. On the other hand, there are plenty of ones that do and I don’t see much profit in ignoring or privileging either set of tools. From a pure Grinding perspective, it’s using whatever tools are at hand and using whatever works. For many people — many Grinders it seems — pharmacological intervention (be nootropics or enthogens) works.

    And you’re right, Salvia is a hallucinogen. For me, it’s a hallucinogen that provides a nice assist with being able to step out of a situation or complex system so I can look at it from different angles. It’s got other uses for me, too, but those are part of my personal OS and not anything I expect anyone else to buy into. For me, these things are very useful, for someone else, it might not be. *shrug*

    And yes, I can do creative problem solving our writing or what have you in a non-pharmacologically altered state but it’s (and this is coming from someone who is pretty up on his non-drug induced cognitive states) far different from what these substances provide.

    As a Grinder, I’m going to use whatever tool is at hand. Zazen meditation, Yoga, LSD, Yage, a hammer, Twitter… you get the idea.

    As for getting to a point where perceptual alteration is no longer necessary? I don’t think humanity will ever get to that point. The methods will change, but we’ll always be seeking new ways to think.

    I hope.

  8. Hubs of Salvia Research Goes Mainstream…

    hubs about Euphoria Languages to The logic there — that Salvia despite not having a euphoric high and despite being quite useless as a recreational drug is popular because it is fast acting — is interesting, to say the least. There’s also a usa…

  9. [...] conventional medicinal properties and to determine why it is used. Quickly gaining popularity amohttp://grinding.be/2008/05/04/salvia-research-goes-mainstream/Weekend events Get a Cowpens Junior Ranger badge Spartanburg Herald-JournalCowpens National [...]

  10. I’m skeptical about the some of the assertions made above, particularly the claim that salvia does not produce euphoric effects. In fact it says “Salvia doesn’t cause the typical euphoric state associated with other hallucinogens like LSD”. Using salvia I have personally experienced intense euphoria, on many occasions.Also, uncontrollable laughter is one of the documented effects of the drug. Like any psychoactive compound, salvia offers a wide range of experiences, many of which can be influenced by the users psychological condition.
    However, to state that LSD typically induces euphoria is also highly inaccurate, especially if one considers the sensitive dependence on so called “set and setting”.
    I don’t want to say it but, bullshit, if you ask me.

  11. I am doing research on salvia and am writing articles on salvia. I am going to write 50 articles on various topics on salvia. I want someone to review my article. I will be grateful to you.This is my blog http://salviamonster.com/wpmu

  12. This is the most informative website on salvia divinorum I have found so far. To learn more check it out!

    http://www.SalviaSociety.org